Gay Marriage is Legal in California
California joins Massachusetts. I’ll be interested to read the decision when I get the chance. As for me, let me reiterate my usual point. I am not categorically opposed to gay marriage. However, I think we’re rushing too fast to change human relationships that have been fixed across all human cultures for thousands of years: marriage is between a man and a woman. Even polygamy doesn’t mess with that basic (and biological) principle. I prefer more thought before getting pushed politically int
read
But — Do Not Expect A Mass Exodus Of Closeted, Toe-Tapping Republicans To Flock To “The Golden State” INDEED. If I have the Constitutional “right” to marry my lovely wife, then so shall G.O.P. darlins’ Larry Craig and Ted Haggard have that same Constitutional “right” to come out of their lonely “closets” to marry each other, though we can all rest assured neither man will be “publicly-pleased” with today’s ruling by the California State Supreme Court to grant that right to them. “Activist j
read
California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban.
read
The California Supreme Court presumed today to write new law, ushering in the brave new world of gay marriage for our nation's most populous state. An activist majority of its justices elected to sway with the prevailing cultural breezes. For those who maintain that it will not happen in North Carolina, I suggest the opposite. It, in fact, will eventually happen here if we elect judges who will be predisposed to this type of mischief.
read
California Gay-Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Posted by Joseph Posted: May 15, 2008 at 2:26 pm No Responses Del.icio.us Digg Technorati As usual, California leads the way on issues of civil rights. California’s top court has ruled that a state law banning marriage between same-sex couples is unconstitutional. The state’s Supreme Court said the “right to form a family relationship” applied to all Californians regardless of sexuality. Hey Ohio- you want the rest of the country/
read
California joins Massachusetts. I’ll be interested to read the decision when I get the chance. As for me, let me reiterate my usual point. I am not categorically opposed to gay marriage. However, I think we’re rushing too fast to change human relationships that have been fixed across all human cultures for thousands of years: marriage is between a man and a woman. Even polygamy doesn’t mess with that basic (and biological) principle. I prefer more thought before getting pushed politically int read
But — Do Not Expect A Mass Exodus Of Closeted, Toe-Tapping Republicans To Flock To “The Golden State” INDEED. If I have the Constitutional “right” to marry my lovely wife, then so shall G.O.P. darlins’ Larry Craig and Ted Haggard have that same Constitutional “right” to come out of their lonely “closets” to marry each other, though we can all rest assured neither man will be “publicly-pleased” with today’s ruling by the California State Supreme Court to grant that right to them. “Activist j read
The California Supreme Court presumed today to write new law, ushering in the brave new world of gay marriage for our nation's most populous state. An activist majority of its justices elected to sway with the prevailing cultural breezes. For those who maintain that it will not happen in North Carolina, I suggest the opposite. It, in fact, will eventually happen here if we elect judges who will be predisposed to this type of mischief. read
California Gay-Marriage Ban Ruled Unconstitutional Posted by Joseph Posted: May 15, 2008 at 2:26 pm No Responses Del.icio.us Digg Technorati As usual, California leads the way on issues of civil rights. California’s top court has ruled that a state law banning marriage between same-sex couples is unconstitutional. The state’s Supreme Court said the “right to form a family relationship” applied to all Californians regardless of sexuality. Hey Ohio- you want the rest of the country/ read
No comments:
Post a Comment